I am very disappointed in the people praising the censoring / editing of Roald Dahl’s books.  

Let me tell you a little story.  

About five years ago I decided to re-visit Treasure Island.  I found an unabridged version.   I was surprised to discover that Long John Silver had a black lover.   Because the book used the term “n–ress” the mention of her was removed from many American editions of the book when I grew up.

Note: I am not saying they removed the N word.  I am saying they removed her *all together.* I didn’t know Long John Silver had a love interest until I was in my thirties and read an unabridged version of the novel.

It revealed so much about the story that I hadn’t noticed before.

1.  That Long John Silver believed in love despite what was considered a cultural norm of the time.  He didn’t care about what others considered proper and he was in love.

2.   It shows that even Robert Louis Stevenson acknowledged the existence of interracial couples and yet no movie version I can think of addressed this until the TV series Black Sails.

3. It helped remind me of the culture of the era in which Treasure Island takes place and when it was written, the stigma against interracial relationships that existed in America right into the twentieth century and in some places is still a thing.

Sometimes books tell us more than just a story.   They show us how a world was once viewed.  

I felt like this was an important discovery, that Long John Silver had a black lover (or wife).   And I was even a little angry that I had been robbed of this in previous readings of the book.  

I think the removal of words like “Fat” and “ugly” from Roald Dahl’s books does us a disservice.   It “cleans up” the past and denies a chance for us to learn some of the less pleasant aspects of the past and how and why language has changed since then.    What should be a teaching point and experience is lost in the name of sensitivity.  

I felt cheated and it even felt a little racist that Long John Silver’s love interest isn’t mentioned in many editions of Treasure Island.  And I feel that one day there may be similar feelings if people discover they aren’t reading the original versions of Dahl’s books.

Try to remember the original reason Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit  451.  It wasn’t about an evil government taking away people’s blooks. It was about this group and that group getting offended at various titles until they just banned everything to try to make everyone happy.    

You know you're talking to someone with an extreme bias when you say "I don't think we should talk politics" and their response is to accuse you of supporting the other side 🥴

No, both sides fcking suck and are full of idiots, leave me alone

And whatever "side" you may or may not be on, nobody fucking owes you a political discussion. Sheesh

Hey guess what if your response to "I don't wanna talk politics" is to throw a tantrum and accuse them of being part of your enemies, chances are you are going to drive them into to the side of your enemy by being a nosy judgemental prick.


asker portrait
Anonymous asked:

Man i really hope that nothing bad happens to AO3.

I know that it is silly to be attached to a fucking fanfiction website, but seeing all the bullshit happening to other places this year (twitter being twitter, Threads and instagram being a mess, Tumblr threatening to become worse just to appease people that don't even use it) it makes me worry for a nonprofit place with a actually good tagging system.

Also, the only other fanfic site i really go to besides it and reaallyy old sites for older fandoms i'm into is Fanfiction.net, and it is annoying as fuck to use it nowdays, especially on mobile (you have to do captcha sooo many times, and you can't really download a fic nor read it all in one page...)

theliterarywolf:

That’s what a lot of people either don’t understand or refuse to acknowledge when it comes to AO3.

From its ground up, its core purpose is an Archive for transformative works. It’s not some Hypnosis Engine to convince people that preying on children is okay; it’s not some sort of propaganda machine. It’s an Archive for fanfic (and, to an extension, fanart).

But also in its core purpose is the element of self-agency. ‘Our Own’. AO3 has one of the best, most comprehensive filtering systems on the internet. That is a fact that can’t be denied. And the reason for this filtering system is, of course, for people to be able to see what they want and avoid what they don’t.

So, yes, it is just a silly fanfiction site at the end of the day, but the fact that it’s one of the few sites on the internet that has stuck to its initial mission statement come hell or high water is why it’s so important in the current internet scape. It’s also why, whenever the donation drive rolls around, it’s so fucking exhausting to see Jimmy and Sally Don'tknowshit making posts about 'oh, why don’t people donate to real causes’ or 'AO3 really makes a living scamming people’.

Don't forget the photo of him naked doing a fat rail of coke off his niece's naked ass in his bedroom.

You are presented with two options.

A) The Universe you live in is one where no one dies, everyone exists forever in eternal bliss, but every so often one person will be torn from this bliss and sent to a dimension of eternal suffering from which they cannot escape.

You know your time is finite in this blissful realm, but it could happen to you tomorrow or millions perhaps trillions of years from now.

B) The universe you live in is one where no one dies, everyone exists forever in eternal suffering and torment, but every so often one person is torn from the suffering and sent to a dimension of eternal bliss and happiness, from which they cannot escape.

You know your time in this hellish realm is finite, you could escape tomorrow or perhaps millions if not trillions of years from now.

Which existence would you choose?

A

B

Please remember to reblog to give the poll a good sample size, and perhaps explain your choice in the tags.

That's a tough one

Are both not the same?

No

How can you be sure?

Because one is the proposition that you'll enjoy happiness but will be punished with unending suffering.

The other is the proposition that you'll have to endure suffering to be granted access to happiness.

Also, I made the post.

How bout I choose neither

image

image
image

@staff if you [change] the [design] of the fucking [dashboard] i will kill you

Ladies- listen to me-

Please don't go under the knife to try and make yourself "pretty", you look fine. I don't care if you have a "weird nose" "don't like your eyebrows" or "hate your jawline" you're already beautiful, stop trying to cut and grind bits of yourself off to fit what society says pretty is.

1 2 3 4 5 Next